<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Faro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doublefacers.com/2010/01/anti-faro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2010/01/anti-faro/</link>
	<description>sleight of hand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2010/01/anti-faro/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=827#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>Does have many apps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does have many apps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2010/01/anti-faro/comment-page-1/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=827#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>***Originally posted on theory11 - reposting here***

A number of Youtube videos on this move have been put up. IMO this is one of the best. It&#039;s perfect after adjusting one card!

I know most videos of this type are just for demo purposes but I find it funny that most people who do the move execute  it and then do a bridge to put everything back together effectively negating the move!

In terms of practical application, stripping the cards out after the move by pulling them apart might seem too  obvious — assuming you wanted to get the deck back to pre shuffled/weave state. I mean you DO that with the anti-faro but then you have to separate and cut.

One idea I had is after you do the anti-faro, while the cards are now effectively a perfect faro, is to lay the &#039;weaver&#039; on a table and finish with a push through shuffle. I think of it as one step back, two steps forward: &#039;back&#039; being the anti-faro, (carry me back to old virginity!), and the &#039;forward&#039; part is picking up the push through shuffle mid-stream by finishing and then pulling out and slapping.  No. Not that.

Mad skillz on both. But if you can do the anti-faro then I think you could probably execute a good push through  shuffle with some practice. While this is not an application per se, it IS a way to get them &#039;un-screwed&#039; so you can then proceed down the yellow brook road. Just my .02.

Full disclosure: I cannot do either move. The push through shuffle interests me and I&#039;m probably going to buy Jason  England&#039;s Foundations DVD in the near future.

Note: Not being intimately familiar with the anti-faro I don&#039;t know what state the cards are in after the move. I&#039;m  wondering if there&#039;s enough air between the cards after it to accomplish a push through shuffle without  undue fiddling with the deck. Maybe someone who does this move, even if you&#039;re still just practicing it, could  weigh in on this.

Thanks,
Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Originally posted on theory11 &#8211; reposting here***</p>
<p>A number of Youtube videos on this move have been put up. IMO this is one of the best. It&#8217;s perfect after adjusting one card!</p>
<p>I know most videos of this type are just for demo purposes but I find it funny that most people who do the move execute  it and then do a bridge to put everything back together effectively negating the move!</p>
<p>In terms of practical application, stripping the cards out after the move by pulling them apart might seem too  obvious — assuming you wanted to get the deck back to pre shuffled/weave state. I mean you DO that with the anti-faro but then you have to separate and cut.</p>
<p>One idea I had is after you do the anti-faro, while the cards are now effectively a perfect faro, is to lay the &#8216;weaver&#8217; on a table and finish with a push through shuffle. I think of it as one step back, two steps forward: &#8216;back&#8217; being the anti-faro, (carry me back to old virginity!), and the &#8216;forward&#8217; part is picking up the push through shuffle mid-stream by finishing and then pulling out and slapping.  No. Not that.</p>
<p>Mad skillz on both. But if you can do the anti-faro then I think you could probably execute a good push through  shuffle with some practice. While this is not an application per se, it IS a way to get them &#8216;un-screwed&#8217; so you can then proceed down the yellow brook road. Just my .02.</p>
<p>Full disclosure: I cannot do either move. The push through shuffle interests me and I&#8217;m probably going to buy Jason  England&#8217;s Foundations DVD in the near future.</p>
<p>Note: Not being intimately familiar with the anti-faro I don&#8217;t know what state the cards are in after the move. I&#8217;m  wondering if there&#8217;s enough air between the cards after it to accomplish a push through shuffle without  undue fiddling with the deck. Maybe someone who does this move, even if you&#8217;re still just practicing it, could  weigh in on this.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2010/01/anti-faro/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=827#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Though I don&#039;t have the book with me, I can tell you Juan Tamariz has applications for the anti-faro in combination with his memorized deck that can be found in Mnemonica. I am not a practitioner of the memorized deck so I cannot give you specific details either past Juan using the anti-faro as a false shuffle.

Christian Engblom also has a dvd in which he explains the anti-faro, but I am not sure about applications.

In the second phase of David Williamson&#039;s Aunt Mary&#039;s Terrible Secret, the anti-faro could be used instead of jogging pairs individually but this requires the cards alternate in colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I don&#8217;t have the book with me, I can tell you Juan Tamariz has applications for the anti-faro in combination with his memorized deck that can be found in Mnemonica. I am not a practitioner of the memorized deck so I cannot give you specific details either past Juan using the anti-faro as a false shuffle.</p>
<p>Christian Engblom also has a dvd in which he explains the anti-faro, but I am not sure about applications.</p>
<p>In the second phase of David Williamson&#8217;s Aunt Mary&#8217;s Terrible Secret, the anti-faro could be used instead of jogging pairs individually but this requires the cards alternate in colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2010/01/anti-faro/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=827#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Gregory Wilson was lecturing in Cardiff, Wales about 6 months ago and actually demo&#039;d a great triumph effect utilizing the anti-faro. 

Nailed it first time as well.

Greg mentioned releasing it in his next set of lecture notes.

Of course he credited Christian Engblom fully


Lloyd.

P.s. love this blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory Wilson was lecturing in Cardiff, Wales about 6 months ago and actually demo&#8217;d a great triumph effect utilizing the anti-faro. </p>
<p>Nailed it first time as well.</p>
<p>Greg mentioned releasing it in his next set of lecture notes.</p>
<p>Of course he credited Christian Engblom fully</p>
<p>Lloyd.</p>
<p>P.s. love this blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

