<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on magic.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves Tourigny</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Tourigny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very nice application of an Ernest Earick steal. Never saw someone do it as smoothly as you though.  Congratulation!!

I do not agree with your rant at least in part.  Presentation is not the end all of magic though as some seems to think but it is an integral part of the mysteries.  Don&#039;t have time to say more maybe later.

Yves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very nice application of an Ernest Earick steal. Never saw someone do it as smoothly as you though.  Congratulation!!</p>
<p>I do not agree with your rant at least in part.  Presentation is not the end all of magic though as some seems to think but it is an integral part of the mysteries.  Don&#8217;t have time to say more maybe later.</p>
<p>Yves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves Tourigny</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves Tourigny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very nice application of an Ernest Earick steal.  Congratulation!

I do not agree with your rant at least in part.  Presentation is not the end all of magic though as some seems to think but it is an integral part of the mysteries.  Don&#039;t have time to say more maybe later.

Yves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very nice application of an Ernest Earick steal.  Congratulation!</p>
<p>I do not agree with your rant at least in part.  Presentation is not the end all of magic though as some seems to think but it is an integral part of the mysteries.  Don&#8217;t have time to say more maybe later.</p>
<p>Yves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldfarb</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldfarb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-985</guid>
		<description>fooled me until you exposed it to me in person, had no idea how you were stealin that card</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fooled me until you exposed it to me in person, had no idea how you were stealin that card</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaded</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>jaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-734</guid>
		<description>got it...
 

 tnx
-jaded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got it&#8230;</p>
<p> tnx<br />
-jaded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chang</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-731</guid>
		<description>3 letters and starts with T.  thinking too hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 letters and starts with T.  thinking too hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaded</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>jaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-729</guid>
		<description>im really having a hard time figuring the password out.
 a little help plz.

 tnx
 -jaded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im really having a hard time figuring the password out.<br />
 a little help plz.</p>
<p> tnx<br />
 -jaded</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-704</guid>
		<description>I think Richard&#039;s point is true And I agree with him. Magic is not what you do but what spectators see. And you change spec&#039;s perception by your presentation.
Even if presentation is not above the technique, it&#039;s still important. I&#039;m thinking that the ratio is 40/60 in close-up.
@Richard :  Can you come on my blog
http://cardstudy.blogspot.com/
Tell me your point of view on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Richard&#8217;s point is true And I agree with him. Magic is not what you do but what spectators see. And you change spec&#8217;s perception by your presentation.<br />
Even if presentation is not above the technique, it&#8217;s still important. I&#8217;m thinking that the ratio is 40/60 in close-up.<br />
@Richard :  Can you come on my blog<br />
<a href="http://cardstudy.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://cardstudy.blogspot.com/</a><br />
Tell me your point of view on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-700</guid>
		<description>I dont quite agree with what you&#039;re saying. I think magic should be about entertaining and audience and not just simply showing off your skills. And its rather hard to to that without any patter or presentation.

I do agree with you on some points that most magicians dont know how to properly create a presentation for a magic trick. Like you said, some will blurt a joke during the magic moment, which does ruin the impact of the magic. But i dont think that getting rid of patter completely is a good thing to do.

About what you said about the &quot;performance character&quot;, i think it&#039;s not the bullshit you think it is. Every professional magician out there wants people to remember their magic, but they also want them to remember the magician. Therefore they will have very extreme and unique stage personas so that they will remember them afterwards. So when they describe it to their friends later they&#039;ll say &quot;This fat magician guy with a beard made this big ball of sponge appear in my hand!&quot; (al goshman)

I think that the problem with magic today is that everyone has been sucked in by that &quot;visual magic is the only good magic&quot; non sense. Every is working on the most visual color change or the most visual sandwich effect. Yeah, they may look cool, but are people really gonna remember that afterwards? As opposed to traditonal magic, such as a 100 dollar bill change. That&#039;s no where near as visual but it has the emotional impact that magic needs. They&#039;ll remember that way better then they will remember a color change.

Ok i&#039;m getting off topic here but my main point is that magic should be entertaining so that it will create a unique experience for the audience. I dont think any famous magician would be as successful as they are now without using any patter or presentation.

Perhaps you should read Strong Magic by Darwin Ortiz. A lot of my thoughts come from that book. I tells you how to create a GOOD presentation, one that will not hinder the magic.

I&#039;m not trying to criticize you Tony, i have seen you in action and i know you&#039;re a great magician. I just dont agree with this rant and wanted to give you some of my thoughts. So i hope this doesnt create any tension, cuz we already have enough of that in the magic world.

Ok, cya.

P.S. That change was pretty awesome, but the vanish blew me away. Nice job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont quite agree with what you&#8217;re saying. I think magic should be about entertaining and audience and not just simply showing off your skills. And its rather hard to to that without any patter or presentation.</p>
<p>I do agree with you on some points that most magicians dont know how to properly create a presentation for a magic trick. Like you said, some will blurt a joke during the magic moment, which does ruin the impact of the magic. But i dont think that getting rid of patter completely is a good thing to do.</p>
<p>About what you said about the &#8220;performance character&#8221;, i think it&#8217;s not the bullshit you think it is. Every professional magician out there wants people to remember their magic, but they also want them to remember the magician. Therefore they will have very extreme and unique stage personas so that they will remember them afterwards. So when they describe it to their friends later they&#8217;ll say &#8220;This fat magician guy with a beard made this big ball of sponge appear in my hand!&#8221; (al goshman)</p>
<p>I think that the problem with magic today is that everyone has been sucked in by that &#8220;visual magic is the only good magic&#8221; non sense. Every is working on the most visual color change or the most visual sandwich effect. Yeah, they may look cool, but are people really gonna remember that afterwards? As opposed to traditonal magic, such as a 100 dollar bill change. That&#8217;s no where near as visual but it has the emotional impact that magic needs. They&#8217;ll remember that way better then they will remember a color change.</p>
<p>Ok i&#8217;m getting off topic here but my main point is that magic should be entertaining so that it will create a unique experience for the audience. I dont think any famous magician would be as successful as they are now without using any patter or presentation.</p>
<p>Perhaps you should read Strong Magic by Darwin Ortiz. A lot of my thoughts come from that book. I tells you how to create a GOOD presentation, one that will not hinder the magic.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to criticize you Tony, i have seen you in action and i know you&#8217;re a great magician. I just dont agree with this rant and wanted to give you some of my thoughts. So i hope this doesnt create any tension, cuz we already have enough of that in the magic world.</p>
<p>Ok, cya.</p>
<p>P.S. That change was pretty awesome, but the vanish blew me away. Nice job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-689</guid>
		<description>Never mind, figured it out. Doh. Haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind, figured it out. Doh. Haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2009/09/thoughts-on-magic/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doublefacers.com/?p=806#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Sweet post, with a lot of good points.

I&#039;ve tried 6 different versions of writing the password, but it won&#039;t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet post, with a lot of good points.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried 6 different versions of writing the password, but it won&#8217;t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
