<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lesson #1 : Visual Noise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Au</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcesunseen.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-83</guid>
		<description>I think the little clip of me doing Shifts was a good example of this. Sometimes, when you&#039;re used to well... not watching yourself from a spectator&#039;s standpoint, or being caught off guard, you have no idea how distracting and fast you could be moving.

All of these newbies learn all of these very flashy moves and feel a need to show them off constantly to prove something. I&#039;ve been there before and I still have the urge to do a LePaul Spread for a card selection and stuff... but there&#039;s an obvious difference between noise that&#039;s part of the music and noise that&#039;s just static.

Besides, if you&#039;re in the brilliant place where the work is done and it&#039;s all been &quot;silent&quot;, let the silence speak for itself. Just being quiet and pausing and delaying a turnover versus all of that extra moment gets some of the best reactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the little clip of me doing Shifts was a good example of this. Sometimes, when you&#8217;re used to well&#8230; not watching yourself from a spectator&#8217;s standpoint, or being caught off guard, you have no idea how distracting and fast you could be moving.</p>
<p>All of these newbies learn all of these very flashy moves and feel a need to show them off constantly to prove something. I&#8217;ve been there before and I still have the urge to do a LePaul Spread for a card selection and stuff&#8230; but there&#8217;s an obvious difference between noise that&#8217;s part of the music and noise that&#8217;s just static.</p>
<p>Besides, if you&#8217;re in the brilliant place where the work is done and it&#8217;s all been &#8220;silent&#8221;, let the silence speak for itself. Just being quiet and pausing and delaying a turnover versus all of that extra moment gets some of the best reactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcesunseen.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-82</guid>
		<description>How about a lesson/tip video on simplicity and consistency.  For example, doing a double and single lift the same way, downplaying your slights to make them seem innocent and natural movements.

I feel a lot of people overlook this and could use a source / example of how a lack of simplicity and consistency add extra attention to where you dont want attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a lesson/tip video on simplicity and consistency.  For example, doing a double and single lift the same way, downplaying your slights to make them seem innocent and natural movements.</p>
<p>I feel a lot of people overlook this and could use a source / example of how a lack of simplicity and consistency add extra attention to where you dont want attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcesunseen.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Hehe, all the visual noise reminded me of Jay Sankey...certainly distracting.

Great tip, simple yet very important.

Thanks for doing this Tony, can&#039;t wait for your future lessons/tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe, all the visual noise reminded me of Jay Sankey&#8230;certainly distracting.</p>
<p>Great tip, simple yet very important.</p>
<p>Thanks for doing this Tony, can&#8217;t wait for your future lessons/tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rossi</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Rossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcesunseen.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I will admit that I definitely do fiddle with the deck when I am just talking during an effect.

But I know see that it is very distracting, and that one-way deck got me, I must say I thought that no one actually did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will admit that I definitely do fiddle with the deck when I am just talking during an effect.</p>
<p>But I know see that it is very distracting, and that one-way deck got me, I must say I thought that no one actually did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://www.doublefacers.com/2008/11/lesson-1-visual-noise/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forcesunseen.wordpress.com/?p=73#comment-79</guid>
		<description>good advice.  I love watching youtube videos, or even some videos on t11 where people feel they have to click the card 7.653 times on average, before they turn it over.  Or why, every single time they turn over a card, they have to spin it for 14.5632 seconds.

The idea of &quot;simplicity&quot; has truly disappeared from the magic world amongst new magicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good advice.  I love watching youtube videos, or even some videos on t11 where people feel they have to click the card 7.653 times on average, before they turn it over.  Or why, every single time they turn over a card, they have to spin it for 14.5632 seconds.</p>
<p>The idea of &#8220;simplicity&#8221; has truly disappeared from the magic world amongst new magicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
